Maybe this is offers a suggestion as to why the oomph is decidely, ahem, lacking: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_sesit&sid=aG7ojQexv3Nc
I'm not sure why, but I was expecting a little more oomph, but we certain got a little less aaaaaaarrrgggggggggghhhhhhhhhhh!
Maybe this is offers a suggestion as to why the oomph is decidely, ahem, lacking:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_sesit&sid=aG7ojQexv3Nc