File this under projects that I wished I had started two years ago. . . I wish that I had created a shopping list of basic staples: coffee, sugar, milk, butter, bacon, eggs, flour, cereal, chicken, turkey, beef and pork. (I'm purposely leaving out vegetables.) On this list, I would unitize the staple (per pound, per dozen, per gallon), and chronicle the cost change quarterly. Oh well.
If I were to put my futurist hat on (its made of tin foil!), I would say that food inflation has the potential to be one of the most serious, global social/economic issues that we will likely face in the future.
From the BLS, you can create this chart--or any chart on specific prices--by following the BLS link in the sidebar. You can see this how this chart is produced here:
If I'm reading the above chart correctly, farm product prices have increased 39+% since Jan of 2006. Of course, you know that, because your food bill has gone up.
Grain price increases are far reaching as you know: beer, cereal, flour, tortillas, livestock feed. Further, these grains are the nutritional base for foreign hunger programs. While so much of Wall Street is enamored with the notion of more middle class consumers (for goods), these middle class consumers need to consume food. A marvelous poetic justice (a nice retribution for the avarice that William B notes in the comments section of the previous post) for our business tycoons will be our newly minted consumers dealing with extraordinary food inflation taking away precious dollars for trinkets.
I think that the most significant thing that I'll see in the final third of my life is our country's declining political and economic hegemony. I've mentioned it here before. I grew up when America's might and right was unparalleled.
We talk much in this country about our love of freedom. (Warning: I'm working up to a point) Mark and I have been watching the HBO series, "John Adams". I read McCullough's excellent biography. I read Adams' and Franklin's biographies back to back, with full expectations that I would enjoy the Franklin biography better. That was not to be. I was captivated by Adams. I also remember vividly the crappy politics that were played--another reminder that nothing ever changes.
The production (which I can proudly say was filmed in our beautiful Virginia, capitalizing on the Williamsburg) with its wonderful actors (Paul Giamatti and Laura Linney) reminds me of the incredible weight of the deliberations to assert independence--and the extraordinary uncertainty of the outcome. It does give me comfort to know that whatever befalls humanity, we have an amazing capacity to dig deep and find what is best in us.
My point. I'm developing this gradual awareness that we've jeopardized our country's economic freedoms (hard deliberated, hard fought and hard won by our independence patriots) through our constant strivings to sate our desire for bigger, newer, shinier, pricier. . . . We've done that through borrowing--not through true wealth creation--at least not on behalf of the consumers. NG notes the media as playing a role in shaping our views. I'd amplify 'media' to include the barrage of advertisements. The media assaults us daily to shape our role as consumers and creating these 'ideals' of how we should look, dress, live, eat and leisure. Nothing is more efficient than advertising in finding your and my inner magpie and seducing it with the lure of shiny objects.
I'm sure that you've seen the "Feed the Pig" campaign.
I just researched it and was happy to learn that it is sponsored by the AICPA. We've squandered so much of our wealth in our consumption beyond our means. Our current crisis is a credit crisis. We have debt without adequate underlying asset values or means to repay. Rather than having net assets (assets greater than liabilities) we have net debt. You know that equation. Somehow that hole gets filled--and the filling of it generally means lost jobs and loss of owner/shareholder value.
My point is not to be dark and pessimistic, but at some point in time we have to realize that we need to ignore our inner magpie and feed the pig. It is a sea change, and such a change in behavior will (1) take time to take hold--unless it is forced through a shock which may well be the case; and (2) will have long lasting ramifications for industry, both ours and the worlds.
The Bernstein article touched on that a bit. I hope that you take time to read it.
5 comments:
nice guy-
Let me begin by apologizing for attempting to label the motives behind your remarks. That was uncalled for.
Delivery is as much of any message as content (some would even weight delivery over 50%). You describe your own writing style as 'quirky and offhand.' Being eccentric is a choice...if you choose an idiosyncratic delivery, then you know ahead of time the reception may be cold, or your motives may be misinterpreted...
If your intention is to get people to question sacred cows, I would suggest you begin by earning their trust before proceeding to challenge every one of their assumptions. Show respect for a group when you enter a discourse, and they will respect you.
Sorry for the unpleasant experience, and I'll choose wiser responses next time.
2nd_ave
2nd
No harm done.
‘Nice guys’ don’t hold grudges. LOL
My “nature” is that I don’t take words seriously – I see them as surface phenomena.
Obviously not being a literalist – can be a problem on blogs – where all we have is the written word.
So your point is well taken…
I like to deal with what is behind the words.
The duality of thought gets in the way of everything – especially trading.
There is no duality in reality – there is a chair – but there is no ‘non chair’
It’s far better to “see” things directly rather than through words, numbers or charts.
Perhaps that’s why your trading succeeds 2nd.
All the other people on your blog battle with their lines on their charts, trying to analyze what has already happened and constanly
t-r-y-i-n-g- to “predict it forward”.
Or they are constantly in search of “why” this happened or “why” that happened – or worrying that some PPT is lurking in the background and use it to explain why prices all of a sudden moved.
They must scratch their heads sometimes and wonder how effortlessly 2nd_ave moves into and out of trades – while they are always two steps behind.
“Direct Perception” is the key.
Indicators, Charts et al are only road maps – but with the right side of the page torn off!
We know where we have been and by what route we took – and we know where we “want” to go – but we don’t have the directions.
Groping in the dark with words, and whys, whatfors and maybe’s – won’t get us there – won’t get the trade done - no sir.
Sometimes we just have to LISTEN – yes LISTEN - Without the words – without the "movements" of the mind.
Then life is pure enjoyment – and those trades begin to flow effortlessly.
Kind regards
‘nice
nice guy-
the conversation flows when you explain yourself first (and for one with your writing style, you almost have to knock at the door and explain yourself before the listener allows you entry)...;)
doubt that you would be allowed back on the blog, which is too bad, as i think a different approach would lead to a warm reception of your ideas...but if you decide to try again, let me know...i'll back you up...
2nd_ave
Well done, gentleman. Well done.
NG--Perhaps you can explain a with more tangible examples rather than enigmatic concepts what you mean.
For example, presuming that one is perceiving as clearly as one can, allowing of course for the simple fact that despite one's best efforts there is some bias that is so endemic to our humanness that it is difficult to tame, how would you explain this approach?
Specifically, how does one use whatever tools/disciplines in his/her arsenal to contemplate an investment, evaluate it for its merits and probability of success, and then make a judgment about it?
Post a Comment