Friday, November 24, 2006

No One Knows

I'm a firm believer in fundamentals--in business, in personal life and in investing. Fundamentals are important because they are foundational; the structure on what everything else stands. When you have strong fundamentals and disciplines, you create a stronger, more accurate decision making environment. I will go to the earlier of my grave or the poorhouse believing that true investment fundamentals includes BOTH fundamental analysis and technical analysis.

While a facile command of fundamental and technical analysis is a laudable goal, that goal must exist within a very critical axiom. In fact every investor should recite as his/her daily investment mantra: "No one knows". I wish I had understood this simple, yet powerful, concept earlier on. It's not only applicable to investing but any topic you choose--including your health. As anyone who has faced difficult decisions regarding procedures/regimens knows, you're going to get divergent views. And when your health/life are on the line, those divergences are frightening. You only antidote to "no one knows" is knowledge and YOUR assessment of the risks involved in making decision x v. decision y.

In financial health decisions, one sees those divergences daily. On Friday, we had a whole new symptom to ponder: the falling dollar (You can read a professional's summary here. http://www.thestreet.com/_dm/markets/commodities/10324098.html.) Now I do not pretend to be qualified to explain to you all that it means; but I am qualified to tell you that you should have a rudimentary understanding of what that means. When asset classes have changing relative relationships with other asset classes, there's a bit of a yin yang dynamic unfolding that you should understand. What's bad for one is good for another (in terms of pricing). If the dollar is getting less valuable (relative to other currencies/asset classes) then something with intrinsic value, such as gold and oil, gains in value. Oil declines when the dollar is strong because it is priced in USD (less $'s to buy oil relative to other currencies.) and oil gains when the dollar declines (more $'s are needed because the dollars are valued less relative to other currencies).

So what does that really mean? For one, inflationary pressures will rise. Commodities will cost more for more USD's are required to buy a barrel of oil. There's another malefic result of a dollar going lower--higher interest rates. Why? Our bonds are USD denominated; therefore, if the dollar is going down relative to other currencies and asset classes, investors (and remember more than 50% of the holders of our bonds are foreigners) will require a greater return for those assets in the form of higher interest rates. Now just to mix it up and keep it interesting, you have some fundamental factors influencing oil: (1) OPEC's threatening to decrease supplies; and (2) increasing inventories.

But there's a beneficial result too....American made goods get cheaper and greater exports mean a reduced trade imbalance. Also, if you have ETF's understand the currency in which the share price is denominated. It will affect your returns. In general, Asian and European currency denominated ETF's will benefit from the dollar's falling. Those ETF's will gain in from the dollar's demise.

My point is not to give you any guidance but rather to coax you into developing an understanding of these dynamics and how they weave themselves into the tapestry of the investing climate. They are really important. I think that the best place to educate yourself on the business cycle and which asset classes do well or poorly is George Dagnino's site: https://peterdag.com/s_files/mLcn829S3eP2.pdf If you do nothing in your investment life do this.... Print out, read, and re-read that pdf. I would also urge you to look at his chart of the month. For fans of Bill Cara's site, you will see that George deploys stochastics to inform of the probabilities of moves in the market.

Remember, everyone has an opinion about what the stock market will do, where we are in the economic cycle, what the dollar, oil, gas, soy beans.....fill in the blank. There are several divergent opinions among great luminaries which means you need to tread carefully and understand YOUR risk environment. How? You must equip yourself to separate the wheat from the chafe. You can reduce your perplexions as a new investor through a basic command of economic cycles and of the asset classes that do better or worse at each stage of the cycle. When you do your head scratching, reach for the investor prayer beads and recite your mantra: "no one knows." No meaningful turn in the market or the economy is ever clear until you look in the rear view mirror. Until then, it's just blind mice trying to make sense of the elephant. Nevertheless, you'll be armed with knowledge to make informed decisions that are right for you.

7 comments:

russell1200 said...

His cycle is not "wrong" it is just simplified. An excellent book that covers more of the various business cycles is:

http://www.amazon.com/Business-Cycles-History-Investment-Reality/dp/0470018062/sr=1-1/qid=1164507442/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-9828576-9579162?ie=UTF8&s=books

Knowing that there are a number of different cycles and how they may (or may not) interact, can go a long way toward alleviating confusion.

There is a huge number of very good books on business cycles. I like Lars Tvede's because he gives a very good overview of the major ones.

Leisa♠ said...

Russell, thanks for this resource. So many got this year's four year cycle wrong, I cease to place any stock in it. I'll post something out of the Zurich Axioms my Max Gunther. I'm finding it more prescient than I did upon first reading.

Anonymous said...

Put me on that list of people who got "this" year's four-year cycle wrong. That said, I think the idea of cycles should not be dismissed out-of-hand: I've always believed that that cycles merely represent reversions to the mean.

I haven't read the Tvede book, but definitely intend to check it out. Since you have read it, Russell, what would Tvede say (or does he say anything) about mean reversions vis-a-vis cycles? Or am I just way off-base?

T said...

Good post.

I believe the dollar is weakening because the price of some commmodities will be priced on the world markets in currencies other
than the USD.

China, Russia and Iran are the players pushing not so covertly for this to occur. One common denominator is to reduce the influence of the United States and thus free these and other "communist light" states to trample upon any treaty or rule of law that does not serve to their total advantage.

A new Cold War is upon us. And our public is as oblivious to it as the public of the EU.

Leisa♠ said...

T--not only rumblings about oil being priced differently (eurodollars) but also re-weighting their currency reserves out of the dollar. Who's to know, we'll see as much speculation about that as we do regarding the stock market topping (or not).

Regarding Russia, Iran and China...Marc Faber had a terrific presentation about that threesome. Russia is rising in power and influence.

With so much of our financial underpinnings in the fist of foreigners, we leave ourselves much exposed to economic shenanigans should others wish to lord that over us--our debt, the strength of our dollar and our dependence on oil.

russell1200 said...

Sorry to be slow about responding -but I have been under the weather.

Tvede’s book is a large one and in much of it he pulls together much of what others have already said. Somewhere in there, there is probably a reference to reversion to mean, but I don’t see it.

Reversion to mean and business cycles are not completely contradictory on the face of it.

Tvede notes in his concluding chapter the following 7 Drivers of Cycles:
Monetary Accelerator
Inventory Accelerator
Capital Spending
Collateral Accelerator
Emotional Accelerator
Exhaustion phenomena
Credit Crunch

On average:
The typical inventory cycle is 4.5 years
The typical capital spending cycle is 9 years
The property cycle is 18 years
The peaks and troughs of these cycles have a tendency to force alignment on each other.

He goes over the interaction of these cycles as well. However, much of the fun is in the getting there. There are dueling economists, South Sea Bubble, Fat Tails and all sorts of interesting odds and ends before you get to the conclusion.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the information, Russell.

I was intrigued by the 18 year property cycle. That's a shoe that definitely seems to "fit" right now -- and, in some parts of the country, "squeezes". For this reason I'm always interested in reading Leisa's weekly trustee sales update.