data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df8ac/df8acd1a193b217bb62036e9dc96cb80d051d3d0" alt=""
Of the stocks on this list, I'm familiar with DVA and HWAY.
I'm most interested in watching for the moment. As you can see from the gain/loss % these are pretty volatile stocks.
"Amortization, which results when unpaid interest earned by the Bank is added to borrowers' loan balances, totaled $215.8 million at December 31, 2006, and was $62.6 million at December 31, 2005. Negative amortization increased by $38.0 million during the fourth quarter of 2006 and $153.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Negative amortization has increased over the last two years due to an increase in short-term interest rates.
A $3.0 million loan loss provision was recorded during the fourth quarter of 2006, the same as the third quarter of 2006 and less than the $4.0 million recorded during the fourth quarter of 2005. A loan loss provision of $12.4 million was recorded for the year of 2006 compared with $19.8 million for the prior year. Net loan charge-offs totaled $90 thousand and $190 thousand for the fourth quarter and year of 2006. This compares with net loan charge-offs of $36 thousand and $1.4 million recorded during the comparable periods in 2005. The ratio of non-performing assets to total assets was 0.21% at the end of 2006 compared with 0.05% at the end of 2005."
I posted this on Bill Cara's site
---------------------------------
I am still of the mind that it is dangerous to compare market malady similarities from year x to year y, largely given that the N is so small, there can be no real confidence in either the correlation or the timing of such events. Weather people have the advantage of having vastly more data points, and accordingly, can assign some better probabilities to observable conditions. Therefore, we heed their warnings when they call for a gathering of ominous clouds along with a falling barometer and the blowing of ill winds. And though they bear our watching, they may not lead to bad weather.
I've being reading quite a bit, and I don't pretend to understand it all. But something that repeatedly strikes me is that most market downturns occur not due to failure in the economy, but rather the failure in the credit system. (The Depression was a credit failure, not an economic failure). Economy does well; market does well; increased liquidity encourages investment and suddenly you have asset prices that have gotten ahead of themselves—but it’s not recognized as that, but rather people point to “it’s different this time”.
There can be NO argument that there is a real estate bubble. When an asset class is priced out of the reach of the average profile of a homeowner, as opposed to speculators, then there is a problem—an incontrovertible one. For that reason, and that reason alone, I believe that there has been too much emphasis placed on “subprime” mortgages as being THE problem. It’s the symptom of the larger bubble—it’s not just real estate, it is treasury markets, with artificially low rates because the system is awash with money and will look for a home, despite its providing a paltry return. It’s commodities, though we may be seeing some cracks there. It’s emerging markets.
I’m left to wonder ,then, that it isn’t the stock market that accurately forecasts the demise in the economy, but rather it is the fallout from these excesses that doom the economy. Maybe that sounds stupid, but it has some merit. An over-leveraged system when it receives a shock clamps down. A clamped down credit system has no juice to lubricate the economy, and the gears wind creakingly down.
So if excessive speculation, which leads to excessive leverage, is the root of all financial market evil (and I'm beginning to believe that it is), then the question really isn't whether or not we'll have a hard or soft landing. Rather, it is whether or not market participants will continue to have confidence in the underlying financial structures. Currently, it looks like money is falling out of one asset class into another (e.g. commodities, into tech). But when there is a stumble and a scraped knee, the other side of liquidity, as Bill reminds us, is the debt that is created. And once the perception of the asset is one of declining value (whether stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities), then that debt is going to get satisfied to maintain appropriate debt/asset ratios. To be satisfied, the asset class must be liquidated, and prices must come down. And that is the prick in the balloon. So the question is not a hard landing or a soft landing. The question is whether or not it is a pop or a hiss. If we get a pop, we will have a hard landing. If we get a hiss, we’ll get a soft landing.
But I don't know a thing, and all of this represents a view rooted in ignorance and inexperience. But this is how I make sense of the incomprehensible.
RTD Trustee Sales | |||
Total | >$90K | % >$90K | |
6-Oct-06 | 28 | 15 | 54% |
13-Oct-06 | 28 | 9 | 32% |
20-Oct-06 | 37 | 17 | 46% |
27-Oct-06 | 35 | 23 | 66% |
3-Nov-06 | 30 | 16 | 53% |
10-Nov-06 | 32 | 13 | 41% |
17-Nov-06 | 38 | 19 | 50% |
24-Nov-06 | 39 | 26 | 67% |
1-Dec-06 | 26 | 19 | 73% |
8-Dec-06 | 25 | 14 | 56% |
15-Dec-06 | 24 | 14 | 58% |
22-Dec-06 | 24 | 13 | 54% |
5-Jan-07 | 32 | 19 | 59% |
12-Jan-07 | 40 | 23 | 58% |
"The English Setter has retained its popularity since its introduction to this country primarily because of its usefulness and beauty. As a result of intelligent breeding it has been brought to a high state of perfection. . . The mild, sweet disposition characteristic of this breed along with the beauty, intelligence, and aristocratic appearance it makes in the filed and in the home has endeared it both to the sportsmen as well as lovers of a beautiful, active, and rugged outdoor dog. A lovable disposition makes it an ideal companion; it is, however, a dog that requires considerable exercise and therefore is better suited to ownership in the suburbs than in the city."
"General Appearance: An elegant, substantial and symmetrical gun dog suggesting the ideal blend of strength, stamina, grace and style."